The power of models

In this module, we explore how models move beyond academic exercises to become powerful tools that shape real-world decisions—decisions that can literally change lives, determine insurance premiums, and influence policy.

Throughout this course, we've learned that models are services that transform inputs (x) into outputs (y) through optimized parameters. But the true power of models lies not in their mathematical elegance, but in their application to critical decision-making processes.

Decision making processes: When models determine your insurance premium

Consider this scenario: You're shopping for car insurance. The insurance company asks about your vehicle's make, model, and weight. Within seconds, their algorithm—a sophisticated predictive model—calculates your premium. But what data drives these life-changing decisions?

The chart above reveals a sobering reality about vehicle weight and fatalities. The model shows two distinct patterns:

Blue line (Own car occupants): As vehicle weight increases, deaths to the car's own occupants generally decrease. Heavier cars provide better protection to their passengers through mass, crumple zones, and structural integrity.

Red line (Other people): As vehicle weight increases, deaths to other people—pedestrians, cyclists, occupants of lighter vehicles—dramatically increase. The physics is unforgiving: heavier vehicles transfer more energy during crashes.

The intersection point (purple dot) represents a critical threshold where the safety trade-off becomes apparent. This single data point could determine whether your insurance premium is $800 or $1,200 per year.

Real-world implications of this model:

Insurance pricing: Companies use models like this to assess risk. Drive a heavy SUV? Your liability coverage might cost more because the model predicts higher risk to others. Drive a lightweight car? Your comprehensive coverage might increase due to higher risk to yourself.

Urban policy: City planners use similar models to set speed limits, design bike lanes, and regulate vehicle access in dense areas. The red line's steep slope has influenced policies limiting large vehicles in European city centers.

Manufacturer decisions: Automakers balance these competing safety demands when designing vehicles. The model influences everything from weight distribution to marketing strategies.

Regulatory frameworks: Government agencies use these relationships to set safety standards, crash test requirements, and fuel economy rules that account for the externalized risks of heavier vehicles.

This demonstrates the profound power of models: a mathematical relationship derived from crash data becomes the foundation for decisions affecting millions of people's safety, finances, and daily lives.

🧠 Association vs. Causation

Understanding the difference between association and causation is essential when interpreting data. Just because two things happen at the same time doesn't mean one causes the other!

Let us look at an example:

🍦🦈 This chart shows a strong relationship between monthly ice cream sales and shark attacks. When ice cream sales go up, so do shark attacks.

But does eating more ice cream cause more shark attacks? Of course not! They are both linked to a third factor: hot weather. More people buy ice cream and swim in the ocean when it is hot — increasing both ice cream sales and the chances of shark encounters.

This is a perfect example of association without causation — also known as a spurious correlation.

🔍 More Examples of Spurious Correlations

Here are other pairs that are correlated but not causally connected:

• School grades and shoe size: Younger kids tend to have smaller feet and lower grades — not because foot size affects intelligence, but because of age.

• Number of firefighters and damage caused by a fire: Bigger fires need more firefighters — but sending more firefighters does not cause more damage.

• Training load and injury: Athletes who train more might get injured more, but does training cause injury, or are other factors involved (like recovery, technique, or underlying health)?

🧪 The Takeaway

Association ≠ Causation. Before concluding that one thing causes another, we must rule out:

• Coincidence
• Confounding variables (a hidden factor influencing both)
• Reverse causation (maybe B causes A, not A causes B)

This image below encapsulates this concept quite nicely. This might well be the greatest image exemplifying the common misconception of correlation vs causation. Credits to this X post.

That is why in science and statistics, we use experiments, controlled studies, and critical thinking to figure out what is really going on: not just what appears to be true from the data.

The universal language of models: One equation, infinite applications

One of the most remarkable discoveries in modeling is that completely different systems often follow identical mathematical rules. The first-order differential equation we used for VO₂ kinetics in Module 4 appears everywhere in science and engineering—a testament to the fundamental patterns underlying diverse phenomena.

Consider this elegant equation from Module 4:

This single mathematical relationship describes an astonishing variety of real-world systems. Let's explore four completely different applications of this same equation:

1. VO₂ Kinetics (Exercise Physiology)

Where oxygen uptake responds to changes in steady-state demand with time constant $\tau$.

2. Exponentially Weighted Moving Average (Data Analysis)

Where a smoothed average $\bar{x}(t)$ tracks a noisy input signal $x(t)$ with smoothing parameter $\tau$. This is the continuous-time version of the exponentially weighted moving average used everywhere from stock market analysis to GPS tracking.

3. Banister Fitness-Fatigue Model (Training Science)

Where fitness $G(t)$ and fatigue $F(t)$ respond to training load $w(t)$ with different time constants ($\tau_g$ for fitness decay, $\tau_f$ for fatigue decay). Performance = $G(t) - F(t)$.

4. RC Circuit (Electrical Engineering)

Where capacitor voltage $V_C(t)$ responds to input voltage $V_{in}(t)$ with time constant $\tau = RC$ (resistance × capacitance).

The universal pattern: In every case, we have:

• A state variable that changes over time: $VO_2$, moving average, fitness/fatigue, or voltage
• An input that drives the change: power demand, data signal, training load, or applied voltage
• A time constant that determines response speed: metabolic $\tau$, smoothing $\tau$, adaptation $\tau$, or electrical $\tau$

The mathematical structure is identical—only the physical interpretation changes. A sports scientist optimizing training periodization uses the same differential equation as an electrical engineer designing a filter circuit.

This universality reveals a profound truth: nature tends to organize itself around common mathematical principles. Once you understand the exponential response pattern in one domain, you've gained insight into countless others.

Why does this matter for sports scientists?

• Techniques from engineering (like control theory) can improve training load management
• Signal processing methods can enhance performance data analysis
• Economic forecasting approaches can predict adaptation responses
• Understanding these analogies accelerates learning and problem-solving across disciplines

The equation $\tau\frac{d}{dt}y + y = x$ is not just a mathematical curiosity—it's a fundamental language that describes how systems respond, adapt, and evolve across the entire spectrum of science and engineering.

Checkout

Well done, you were able to complete the sixth module of this course.